Vlad Horsun wrote:

>>Since no BLR based program currently uses anywhere near 255 streams, we
>>aren't creating a backwards incompatibility but an incentive to cut over
>>to a better API. Or we could just add a blr_rse2 with a two byte count.
>>
>>In any case, I'm inclined to think that anybody with over 200 streams
>>has a serious problem with application design.
>>
>>
>
> Stored procedure\trigger have one common counter of streams for all
>containing statements. And there was some reports about this limit.
>
>
>

Really? I didn't know that. I wouldn't have done it that way. Well,
another thing to work around.

--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376