> Since no BLR based program currently uses anywhere near 255 streams, we
> aren't creating a backwards incompatibility but an incentive to cut over
> to a better API. Or we could just add a blr_rse2 with a two byte count.
>
> In any case, I'm inclined to think that anybody with over 200 streams
> has a serious problem with application design.

Stored procedure\trigger have one common counter of streams for all
containing statements. And there was some reports about this limit.

Regards,
Vlad