Dmitry Sibiryakov wrote:

> On 20 Oct 2005 at 10:23, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>
>>Shit usually happens without any expectations. I cannot afford to
>>change the layout of a half of system tables during the Beta stage
>>just because Claudio has reminded us about this old issue.
>
>
> I understand.
>
> On the other hand, this is the last opportunity to change ODS
> before FB3.
> Simple buffer overflows should appear instantly as AV during build
> or a bit later during tests. Backward-compatible short names should
> not be a problem and the rest of bugs may be hunted and killed later
> in service release.
>

On the other hand, why are object names prefixed with 'SQL$' when
building security class name? What is the magic of this prefix? What
happens, if in ODS11 we simply use object name as it's security class name?