Subject | Re: External procedures: call for discussion |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2004-04-01T20:48:21Z |
Hi Martijn,
Here are replies by Eugeney Putilin (I translated it from Russian).
from the engine's point of view.
executing a code in a sandbox manner in order to avoid current
problems with incorrect UDFs that we have.
Best regards,
Eugeney Putilin
Here are replies by Eugeney Putilin (I translated it from Russian).
> I dare to raise the question: Aren't your proposed ExternalYes, that's procedures in different languages, but the are external
> Procedures actually internal procedures in a different language?
from the engine's point of view.
> Even if they will be "external procedures", can the "externalMight be. However preference should be given to the languages
> function" API be upgraded to the same mechanism?
executing a code in a sandbox manner in order to avoid current
problems with incorrect UDFs that we have.
Best regards,
Eugeney Putilin