Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Crypto Extentions to Remote Protocol |
---|---|
Author | Mark O'Donohue |
Post date | 2004-10-26T22:39:04Z |
Jim Starkey wrote:
But we don't want to burden a trusted connection with encrypting all the
traffic - and just want to encrypt the few bits of sensitive data.
Cheers
Mark
> Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:A ssl layer over the current protocol is easy,
>
>>
>>Just a minor question, If this is for the remote protocol
>>why not use SSL/TLS ??
>>
>>
>
> Bottom line, SSL is a viable alternative as long as somebody else wants
> to write the code.
>
But we don't want to burden a trusted connection with encrypting all the
traffic - and just want to encrypt the few bits of sensitive data.
Cheers
Mark