Subject | Re: [Firebird-devel] Re: [Firebird-Architect] Crypto Extentions to Remote Protocol |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2004-10-26T21:02:35Z |
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
standard sockets and one ssl. It would also require another IP protocol
number for the ssl connection.
If you would like to research the ssl option, be my guest.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>Hello:I believe it would require that the server listen on two locks, one
>
>
>
>>Because old clients don't have SSL code in them.
>>
>>
>>
>Ok, but the server should continue to handle connections
>that are done without using SSL (i mean that the usage of SSL
>should be optional), adding ssl support to the wire protocol
>shouldn't be a reason to be not allowed to connect without it,
>or i'm wrong ??.
>
>
>
standard sockets and one ssl. It would also require another IP protocol
number for the ssl connection.
If you would like to research the ssl option, be my guest.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]