> This is more or less a kind of journalling where the journal is sent
> over to another server where it is used to bring another copy of the
> DB up to date, asynchronously instead of synchronously as the
> current shadowing feature works.

Correct

> Will it be easy to send set of pages to the remotes such as only
> committed transactions are reflected in the remotes ?

Yes, the net effect will be that the remote/slave databases will only
"see" committed transactions, even though the disk pages may have
uncommitted changed.


Sean