At 10:53 AM 17/06/2003 +0000, Mr P. Jacobi wrote:

>I hit reply on this post, as it seems to be the saner
>of the two versions.

Darn, and I thought I had the balance perfect! Sorry you failed to
appreciate my attempts to send a URL that you could click-through on, but
it seems you managed OK without my unsolicited help.

>I wouldn't miss the .txt and .doc versions that much, if not
>three out of three browsers (name withheld to protect the guilty)
>were unable to print the .html without cutting off the right
>edge (I came along with editing the .html).

On browser pages that are not printer-friendly, you do have the option of
printing in landscape format. (Just thought I'd throw in that last little
bit of unsolicited help before escaping to avoid the wrath of the list
moderator....)

Helen