Jim Starkey wrote:

> I'm a little sorry to see the original journalling code was long gone,
>
>which is a pity because it did, in fact, work. The operational problem
>was that disks eventually filled up and nobody wanted to pay someone to
>sit around waiting for a tape to change. But then nobody anticipated
>that the Sunday news paper flier would advertise 250 GB drives for
>$150. My, the world does change.
>

I also remember something about a performance issue?

Regards,


Ann

By the way - do get rid of all the WAL and journalling stuff.