Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] RE: Classic vs. superserver (long, very very long) |
---|---|
Author | Arno Brinkman |
Post date | 2002-10-15T21:53:53Z |
Hi, Jim
the DSQL part ignore the BLR part ?
This opens easier ways of implementing new DSQL features also!
Regards,
Arno
> Less than it would appear. BLR is compiled into an execution treeDo you mean complete destroy the BLR part or do you mean let only
> which is then optimized. The SQL compiler could generate the same
> execution tree, just skipping BLR generation and BLR parsing. Nothing
> would require any change to the execution side.
the DSQL part ignore the BLR part ?
This opens easier ways of implementing new DSQL features also!
Regards,
Arno