Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re: proc directory type information tables |
---|---|
Author | Lee Rodgers |
Post date | 2001-02-09T21:50:12Z |
--- dianeb77@... wrote:
information schema as R-O...
SQL 7's more modern but still Sybase-ish system tables
are still there of course, and I've used them to write
metadata crosswalks for data translations / migration
to/from db2 & ms sql (as well as db2 & sybase).
System tables like those are indispensible, but ea/
vendor has it's own structure... not a big deal tho,
since those are usually well documented, just
normalize ea/ vendors schema into your own.
/lee
=====
+--------------------------+
/leebert
+--------------------------+
This concludes our broadcast day.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>Support for the Information Schema wasDon't despair.... actually MS SQL Server 7 has the
>not required for Entry Level
>conformance in SQL92, it was only required
>for anyone claiming
>Intermediate Level conformance ...
>in SQL terms, that's well along the
>road to never-never land.
information schema as R-O...
SQL 7's more modern but still Sybase-ish system tables
are still there of course, and I've used them to write
metadata crosswalks for data translations / migration
to/from db2 & ms sql (as well as db2 & sybase).
System tables like those are indispensible, but ea/
vendor has it's own structure... not a big deal tho,
since those are usually well documented, just
normalize ea/ vendors schema into your own.
/lee
=====
+--------------------------+
/leebert
+--------------------------+
This concludes our broadcast day.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/