Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] dedicated IB filesystem |
---|---|
Author | Claudio Valderrama C. |
Post date | 2000-08-30T07:35:24Z |
> -----Original Message-----If you mean a database device, then the plain response is NO and I would
> From: lists@... [mailto:lists@...]
> Sent: MiƩrcoles 30 de Agosto de 2000 2:14
> To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
> Subject: [IB-Architect] dedicated IB filesystem
>
> dear IB fans,
>
> just wondering if anyone has done any research into whether or not IB
> would benefit from a dedicated filesystem for writing its data, and if
> any steps are being taken to move in this direction.
>
> thanks,
>
> - avi
say that for the time being, NO, too.
IB has already an internal structure on each database. No surprise, of
course. But having a dedicated filesystem sounds like another layer on top
of the operating system: more overhead. This is the way Sybase works or at
least used to work. MsSql inherited the database devices since Sybase
developed it for MS. But ultimately, MS got rid of such overhead in v7 and
implemented each db on top of the operating system as a file, same as with
IB.
What would be the benefits of a dedicated file system for IB, in your
opinion?
C.