Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] PostgreSQL 7 benchmark |
---|---|
Author | Dan Palley |
Post date | 2000-08-14T23:46:01Z |
Well, the results compared to Interbase were based on a single benchmark
(AS3AP), since they couldn't get the TPC benchmark to work with the
Intersolv ODBC driver.
Also, they don't mention whether the Interbase version was classic or
Superserver; I'd expect Classic to fall apart after a large number of users,
based on the lack of a shared cache. The benchmark PC Week did a while ago
showed the same thing (using 5.6 for Linux).
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Karwin [mailto:bill@...]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:03 PM
To: IB-Phoenix@egroups.com
Subject: [IB-Architect] PostgreSQL 7 benchmark
Hmm. Not such good news for InterBase.
http://apachetoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-08-14-008-01-PR-MR-SW
(be careful of URL wrap)
Bill Karwin
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
(AS3AP), since they couldn't get the TPC benchmark to work with the
Intersolv ODBC driver.
Also, they don't mention whether the Interbase version was classic or
Superserver; I'd expect Classic to fall apart after a large number of users,
based on the lack of a shared cache. The benchmark PC Week did a while ago
showed the same thing (using 5.6 for Linux).
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Karwin [mailto:bill@...]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:03 PM
To: IB-Phoenix@egroups.com
Subject: [IB-Architect] PostgreSQL 7 benchmark
Hmm. Not such good news for InterBase.
http://apachetoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-08-14-008-01-PR-MR-SW
(be careful of URL wrap)
Bill Karwin
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com