Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] How/When is BLR 'compiled' |
---|---|
Author | Dalton Calford |
Post date | 2000-07-21T14:36:48Z |
Hi Phil,
Since this is more of a support question, but is very close to what is being
discussed over at IB_DESIGNER@egroups.com (a new list group for a series of
open source projects that are just begining) why don't you flip over there and
we can give you some details from our experiences. The list was started
yesterday to give a central repository for a series of discussions that have
been going on for a few weeks via direct emails.
We have been converting the BLR documentation to HTML (hopefully finished
today) as well as doing some parser work. That should be directly helpful to
you.
best regards
Dalton
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
Since this is more of a support question, but is very close to what is being
discussed over at IB_DESIGNER@egroups.com (a new list group for a series of
open source projects that are just begining) why don't you flip over there and
we can give you some details from our experiences. The list was started
yesterday to give a central repository for a series of discussions that have
been going on for a few weeks via direct emails.
We have been converting the BLR documentation to HTML (hopefully finished
today) as well as doing some parser work. That should be directly helpful to
you.
best regards
Dalton
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although this post is verging on a support issue (smacking wrists as I
> type), with all the recent talk about inheritance, it raises an interesting
> point (to me anyway <g>).
>
> I have a database with several hundred Stored procedures that is design in
> an 'OO' fashion, where I have a 'Base SP' that a number of descendant SP's
> use, and these in turn have descendant SP's and so on. These SP's are used
> directly by my client app and in Triggers. I recently made some quite major
> changes to some of the Base SP's. Now as each SP/Trigger is compiled when
> you issue the ALTER command, the SP's that I changed were corrected, but
> none of the 'descendants'. Now after spending most of the day trying to
> 'recompile' all my SP's in the correct order (and missing one, so having to
> start again), I thought that there must be an easier way to do this. I also
> thought about how this situation would be handled in the 'inheritance'
> situation we have been talking about.
>
> So first (support related) question is there a way to recompile all
> SP/Triggers in the correct order?
>
> Second (architect related) question, if this 'inheritance' functionality is
> to be implemented, would it be just for the initial CREATE of the descendant
> object, or would changes to the 'Base' object at a later date be reflected
> in child classes. If the later, how would the 're-build' of the BLR in the
> correct order be handled.
>
> Feel free not to answer if I am OT.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Old school buds here:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/7081/6/_/830676/_/964189625/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com