Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] SQL Statement Depandance Mapping |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2000-06-30T18:49:11Z |
At 01:25 PM 6/30/00 -0400, Dalton Calford wrote:
In my youth I thought active system tables were a great idea. I've
since changed by mind.
Touch RDB$FORMATS (or whatever) and the world will end. Stick bad BLR
into any number of system tables and gruesome things may happen.
cycles (which ain't going to happen this week or even next) she's
promised to make a pass at it.
Alternatively, DEC used pendle a DSRI architecture book (authored
by our very own dear Dr. Depalma). Perhaps your local computing
archeology center might have a copy.
Jim Starkey
>Could we get the long and the short of it please?If you omit the word "safely" the answer is just about everything.
>
>What SQL objects can we safely create and or modify by simply using DML
>statements against the system tables?
>
In my youth I thought active system tables were a great idea. I've
since changed by mind.
Touch RDB$FORMATS (or whatever) and the world will end. Stick bad BLR
into any number of system tables and gruesome things may happen.
>There are system triggers that don't have the source code included, isAnn's problem.
>it possible for that source (as it is more of macro format vs C source)
>to be released before the rest of the Interbase code?
>
>Is there a simple reference guide to BLR (maybe the bnf or ebnf of theWe've got a copy of the TROFF BLR book. When Ann has a few spare
>blr parser?)
>
cycles (which ain't going to happen this week or even next) she's
promised to make a pass at it.
Alternatively, DEC used pendle a DSRI architecture book (authored
by our very own dear Dr. Depalma). Perhaps your local computing
archeology center might have a copy.
Jim Starkey