Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] SQL Statement Depandance Mapping |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2000-06-30T16:30:48Z |
At 03:38 AM 6/30/00 -0400, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
language, even on system tables?
Jim Starkey
>>I think you'll need to be more specific.
>> DDL is a different story. The real DDL operations are performed
>> by ordinary DML to the system tables. SQL DDL is what is known
>> in the biz as syntactic sugar.
>>
>> Jim Starkey
>
> When I see in the description of the system tables in LangRef "Not used by
>SQL objects", what does it mean, that those tables are not touched by such
>DDL converted to DML?
> Once DML is converted to DDL on system tables, is this converted to BLRHuh? Data manipulation language isn't converted to data definition
>internally, too?
>
language, even on system tables?
Jim Starkey