| Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] Official WISQL (and Delphi data access layer) for InterBase |
|---|---|
| Author | Leyne, Sean |
| Post date | 2000-06-13T16:28:49Z |
Helen (Oh, moderator of this list)
I must disagree with you, a discussion of the merits/demerits of WISQL
vs. IB_WISQL is not a subject for the architecture list.
It is much better suited for the Priorities or perhaps the Marketing
list, anywhere but here.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Borrie [mailto:helebor@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:35 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Official WISQL (and Delphi data
access layer) for InterBase
At 10:25 AM 13-06-00 -0400, you wrote:
not covered by the same open source licensing as InterBase? If so, I
have
not heard of it and I'm the moderator of this list.
As I understood it, the matter of this list is pertinent to anyone
developing against the IB architecture, present and future.
Just an early morning thought from the Moderator of the list...
Helen
___________________________________________________
"Ask not what your free, open-source database can do for you,
but what you can do for your free, open-source database."
(J.F.K.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/830676/_/960910838/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
I must disagree with you, a discussion of the merits/demerits of WISQL
vs. IB_WISQL is not a subject for the architecture list.
It is much better suited for the Priorities or perhaps the Marketing
list, anywhere but here.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Helen Borrie [mailto:helebor@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 11:35 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Official WISQL (and Delphi data
access layer) for InterBase
At 10:25 AM 13-06-00 -0400, you wrote:
>At 05:46 PM 6/12/00 -0700, Jason Wharton wrote:contribute
> >> > Please seriously consider IB_WISQL as a replacement to WISQL.
> >> >
> >
> >I agree that it should be accessible to all who want to use and
> >to it for free. I fully allow that...Is there some proscription against discussing third-party tools that are
> >
>
>May I presume that the discussion of IB_WISQL is in anticipation of
>its pending release under open source? If not, the architecture
>list is not an appropriate forum.
>
>Jim Starkey
not covered by the same open source licensing as InterBase? If so, I
have
not heard of it and I'm the moderator of this list.
As I understood it, the matter of this list is pertinent to anyone
developing against the IB architecture, present and future.
Just an early morning thought from the Moderator of the list...
Helen
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at-
>http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/830676/_/960906484/
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>http://www.interbase2000.org
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
___________________________________________________
"Ask not what your free, open-source database can do for you,
but what you can do for your free, open-source database."
(J.F.K.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/830676/_/960910838/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com