At 02:10 PM 6/1/00 -0700, Charlie Caro wrote:

> > >4.- What's the trick behind the idea FOR UPDATE result
> > >sets are sent with one record per network packet?
> >
><Much wisdom from Charlie, omitted.>
>
>I wanted to document the anomaly so that developers could code around it.
>Unless
>the architects populi disagree, I would like to rollback the change in a
>future
>release to restore the performance.

And perhaps do something clever like actually reserving the rows
for update?

Ann