Benny Schaich wrote:

>
> I know what hurts you deeply here, but this is one of the occasions
> where its
> better to have a "me to" on the feature list - knowing it is useless.
>

This is sort of an aside, but...

Given that something like that goes in, how do we flag it up as being froth?

I don't mind bright marketing ideas as long as they are obviously just that. One
requirement should be that a reasonable developer can evaluate such a 'feature'
in half an hour and discard it as useless.

After all, some people will actually go away and try building a solution using
it. Still, it might help in technical support - separate the idiots from those
that know what they are doing. The 'walk and chew gum' test?

Paul
--

Paul Reeves
Fleet River Software