Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Database names |
---|---|
Author | Tim Uckun |
Post date | 2000-05-02T16:15:46Z |
>file but write it also to reflect additional file, shadows,I don't understand how the registry avoids this problem. Surely I could be
>etc. If the engine were to write the file while somebody
>else had it his editor pending update, the config file update
>would be lost. Or, if a file level lock used, the engine
>would be blocked pending access to the file. Neither is
>very appealing.
editing the registry while a program was modifying the contents of it (or
visa versa). We could overwrite each others changes.
As for XML it might be overkill. I have attempted to use XML in some B2B
stuff and it always seems like it's overkill. If the two parties have to
agree on a schema anyway why not just use a comma delimeted format.? Oh
well I guess that's kind of OT.
I think I remember reading someplace that relational theory dictates that
all schema information be kept in the database itself. I presume this
would include any aliases.
:wq
Tim Uckun
Due Diligence Inc. http://www.diligence.com/ Americas Background
Investigation Expert.
If your company isn't doing background checks, maybe you haven't considered
the risks of a bad hire.