> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Starkey [mailto:jas@...]
>
> At 11:51 AM 4/28/00 -0700, Jason Wharton wrote:
> >
> >I'd also like to see something similar for database aliases.
> Disclosing the
> >physical location of the GDB on the server isn't comfortable to
> me and it is
> >also inconvenient if one decides to relocate it on the server to a new
> >volume or something...
> >
>
> A different problem. It is difficult to look into a database to find
> where to find the database.
>
> Jim Starkey

Why this couldn't be achieved creating a new table inside isc4.gdb? Do you
want to see this global db removed in the future and replaced totally by a
per-db security table(s)?

C.
---------
Claudio Valderrama C.
Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente
http://members.tripod.com/cvalde