|Subject||Re: [IB-Architect] GBAK processing|
At 11:58 AM 4/26/00 -0700, Markus Kemper wrote:
>> Yuck.Well, dammit, lets fix that.
>> Would a better solution be a mechanism to create and
>> detach a shadowed copy? Unlike the gbak case it would
>> be a complete usable copy.
>I agree with the 'yuck' factor. The previous suggestions
>were made with the current available functionality in mind.
>Simply an option available today. I experimented with the
>Shadow idea above a bit with Dalton Calford but, we
>discovered that you could not decouple a shadow from the
>main database without destroying it. At least that's what