Subject | UDF param passing issues |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2000-04-06T21:12:53Z |
At 4/6/00 05:00 PM (Thursday), David Schnepper wrote:
you would have to say "pass params by descriptor when using this UDF".
Then, assuming the UDF is properly written to use the descriptors instead
of the usual param passing mechanism, everything should work, right?
>Actually, there is a way that a UDF can receive parameters "BY DESCRIPTOR".I don't understand why the SQL syntax is relevant except in defining a UDF
>It's yet another of those GDML features that work, but don't have SQL
>syntax to
>support them.
you would have to say "pass params by descriptor when using this UDF".
Then, assuming the UDF is properly written to use the descriptors instead
of the usual param passing mechanism, everything should work, right?