Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] What will make InterBase more attractive? |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2000-04-06T20:46:38Z |
At 4/6/00 04:35 PM (Thursday), Jim Starkey wrote:
flexibility it brought was never properly appreciated or continued.
I believe the majority of UDFs implemented in the past few years have been
written in C. The next most likely language in use is Object Pascal (a la
Delphi). Both are equivalent in their capabilities for this sort of thing.
Therefore, I am hopeful we can get this added Real Soon Now.
>Actually Interbase has had a parameter passing convention modelledI've heard this said before but always wondered why the param passing
>on VMS descriptors from the very beginning of UDFs (version 2?).
>The probably is that languages other than C are incapable of handling
>them. And, unlike VMS descriptors, Interbase descriptors carry
>a null flag. Also, if I remember correctly, a descriptor could be
>used to return a value.
flexibility it brought was never properly appreciated or continued.
I believe the majority of UDFs implemented in the past few years have been
written in C. The next most likely language in use is Object Pascal (a la
Delphi). Both are equivalent in their capabilities for this sort of thing.
Therefore, I am hopeful we can get this added Real Soon Now.