Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re : License Question |
---|---|
Author | Jan Mikkelsen |
Post date | 2000-03-23T21:54:28Z |
Joseph Alba <jalba@...> writes:
[ on inetd being bad ]
Yes, inetd is bad, but that is primarily because the implementation is
broken. It is easy to create various forms of denial of service, it tends
not to handle many connections arriving in close succession, etc.
Tcpserver (from Dan Bernstein's page, http://cr.yp.to/) is a far superior
solution. Look for the ucspi-tcp package.
Jan Mikkelsen
janm@...
[ on inetd being bad ]
Yes, inetd is bad, but that is primarily because the implementation is
broken. It is easy to create various forms of denial of service, it tends
not to handle many connections arriving in close succession, etc.
Tcpserver (from Dan Bernstein's page, http://cr.yp.to/) is a far superior
solution. Look for the ucspi-tcp package.
Jan Mikkelsen
janm@...