Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re: [IB-Priorities] Isolation level implemetation |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2000-12-27T15:29:13Z |
At 05:59 PM 12/27/2000 +0300, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
Could you be more specific about the security problems with superserver?
They should go into future planning.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers. You have answers. We all have questions.
> > >Is the classic model going to continue to be supported?Dmitry - and others,
> >
> > Until the superserver version supports SMP, the ability to identify
> > and kill rogue requests, and the ability to support large caches, the
> > classic won't go away. Maybe never. But when those capabilities are
> > in the server, other faults of classic (security, "hot" pages, clutter)
> > will be significant. Besides, it's open source, so you decide what
> > goes forward and what is abandoned.
>
>It depends. For example, Superserver architecture can't be used for providers,
>at list due to security problems. But Classic is ideal for providers who lease
>not only web but data storage too.
Could you be more specific about the security problems with superserver?
They should go into future planning.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers. You have answers. We all have questions.