Subject | Re: [IB-Architect] Re: [IB-Priorities] Isolation level implemetation |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Kuzmenko |
Post date | 2000-12-27T14:59:13Z |
Hello, Ann!
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
at list due to security problems. But Classic is ideal for providers who lease
not only web but data storage too.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.
"Ann W. Harrison" wrote:
> >wondering what the long term goals are. Is the classic model going toIt depends. For example, Superserver architecture can't be used for providers,
> >continue to be supported?
>
> Until the superserver version supports SMP, the ability to identify
> and kill rogue requests, and the ability to support large caches, the
> classic won't go away. Maybe never. But when those capabilities are
> in the server, other faults of classic (security, "hot" pages, clutter)
> will be significant. Besides, it's open source, so you decide what
> goes forward and what is abandoned.
at list due to security problems. But Classic is ideal for providers who lease
not only web but data storage too.
--
Dmitry Kuzmenko, Epsylon Technologies.