I don't know the answer to (a), but I assumed that the answer to (a) would
also suffice as the answer to (b).

-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Mascia [mailto:om@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:40 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Next ODS change / RLE Encryption



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

How does the character codes >= 128 fit into all this ?

a) Into the current CHAR/VARCHAR storage solution
b) Into your proposal ?

Olivier.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "David Berg" <DaveBerg@...>
To: <IB-Architect@egroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:14 AM
Subject: RE: [IB-Architect] Next ODS change / RLE Encryption

> There's an easy change to RLE encoding that would increase
> compression substantially for long string values.
>
> Use 0 to 128 to mean the character value.
> Use -2 to -128 to mean a repeat count followed by a character.
> Use -1 to mean that the next two bytes are a repeat count followed
> by a character.
>

....

>
> Dave

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8

iQEVAwUBOhJL96IodNUVZIMJAQFcmwf/dPO5q/QKA1cLA6aK8Byt6legC58RKoaw
VgbruMwHmke5m3V6Xm/NTrQLe6lfMkefnGklHpPAEQO49Wj4sc0E7tAbbql0EId7
unNOIlE51DfJpv0q1HpNKqpUvemsCQSboa0nQc41t2iljcrS1xzIhoxGpvFh5opH
dckmMAdrWYXOk/zFGCEBGzMZWObJ18YglvMqQqaI8CzGek3F1GmCGK5o/UeNdX9v
uwM/n2WZOhs5BmsDMuahyXrYmRgEzBvqoVqCWdZ8Mv2RtDr7gcu+sOmq3ieqQ2Ok
Hi5Zp7n+q8UIH+vA8VkOvBb6qHwswj8+0Ndbq+vg8XZlUA2GruBUEQ==
=MN4M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com