| Subject | RE: [IB-Architect] Database files > 2GB. |
|---|---|
| Author | David Berg |
| Post date | 2000-10-19T14:39:15Z |
Which brings us back to the point that my primary concern is manageability.
In other words, if Interbase was capable of adding the additional files on
an as needed basis (without operator intervention), then it's not as
important for us to have support for files > 2/4GB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcelo Lopez Ruiz [mailto:marcelo.lopezruiz@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:13 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database files > 2GB.
This is drifting rather off-topic for this group.
In short: all applications can go over the 4GB "limit". The problem is that
there are a few functions, such as SetFilePointer, which take an offset and
a "pointer to high" offset, in two different parameters. Since this is a
pain in the neck to handle, at best, most programs assume the file won't hit
the 4GB limit, and set the pointer to NULL, ignore the field in structs,
etc.
IMHO, I think multiple data files are more portable, efficient and flexible.
Marcelo
In other words, if Interbase was capable of adding the additional files on
an as needed basis (without operator intervention), then it's not as
important for us to have support for files > 2/4GB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcelo Lopez Ruiz [mailto:marcelo.lopezruiz@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:13 AM
To: IB-Architect@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database files > 2GB.
This is drifting rather off-topic for this group.
In short: all applications can go over the 4GB "limit". The problem is that
there are a few functions, such as SetFilePointer, which take an offset and
a "pointer to high" offset, in two different parameters. Since this is a
pain in the neck to handle, at best, most programs assume the file won't hit
the 4GB limit, and set the pointer to NULL, ignore the field in structs,
etc.
IMHO, I think multiple data files are more portable, efficient and flexible.
Marcelo
----- Original Message -----
From: Marvin Varela RodrÃguez <marvin@...>
To: <IB-Architect@egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database files > 2GB.
> certainly, there is a limit, but there are programs that can handle this
> issue. Others can't.
>
> I've seen 6Gb databases working just find under winnt 4.0 and win2k.
>
> But a video file over 2Gb is imposible to read for windows.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Stuntz" <ib-architect@...>
> Newsgroups: mers.interbase.ib-architect
> To: <ib-architect@...>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [IB-Architect] Database files > 2GB.
>
>
> >
> > Jason Chapman wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought there was an actual limit in NT to 4GB anyway.
> >
> > No, there is no such limit under NTFS.
> >
> > -Craig
> >
> > --
> > Craig Stuntz Vertex Systems Corporation
> > Senior Developer http://www.vertexsoftware.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ib-architect mailing list
> > Ib-architect@...
> > http://mers.com/mailman/listinfo/ib-architect
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
IB-Architect-unsubscribe@onelist.com