Subject | Re: [IBO] development |
---|---|
Author | Hans |
Post date | 2010-03-23T02:16:16Z |
If you link it with your version of IBO (Improved Filed string handling, I
think), do you see a difference ?
think), do you see a difference ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Worboys" <geoff@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [IBO] development
> Hans wrote:
>> I just sent you my little test source code plus database.
>
> OK, I've got the demo... would have liked something simpler.
>
> But anyway I can definitely see where there is a problem.
> Using your precompiled executable I get: 30-ish seconds for
> FIBPlus, 48-ish seconds for IBO. The biggest part of the
> problem seems to centre around a couple tables that send
> the CPU through the roof for quite a long period of time.
>
> I will try with my optimisations in place, but while they
> should help because there are so many almost empty tables,
> I doubt if they will help with the particular high CPU
> problems I see in the execution of your demo.
>
> Chopping things down to isolate the problem will take some
> time, I will get back to you.
>
> --
> Geoff Worboys
> Telesis Computing
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> IB Objects - direct, complete, custom connectivity to Firebird or
> InterBase
> without the need for BDE, ODBC or any other layer.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> http://www.ibobjects.com - your IBO community resource for Tech Info
> papers,
> keyword-searchable FAQ, community code contributions and more !
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>