Subject | Re: [IBO] development |
---|---|
Author | Geoff Worboys |
Post date | 2010-03-22T06:23:14Z |
Hans wrote:
[...]
to prepare times... that should only be important to data
transfers if there is:
. a large number of tables with a (relatively) small number
of rows
and/or
. tables with a large number of fields and a (relatively)
small number of rows
Note too that my tests did not include blobs, they can certainly
slow things down - but should slow down FIBPlus too... but this
is another area where I have not done direct comparison.
Can you try the two command line apps I posted against one or
more of the tables in your transfer? It would be interesting
to see how your numbers compare to what I was getting (prepare
times etc).
--
Geoff Worboys
Telesis Computing
[...]
> It sure looks like your 'Experimental Improvements' could beThe only performance improvement I expect my changes to make is
> quite an asset to IBOjects :)
> Would love to try them out in my tests.
to prepare times... that should only be important to data
transfers if there is:
. a large number of tables with a (relatively) small number
of rows
and/or
. tables with a large number of fields and a (relatively)
small number of rows
Note too that my tests did not include blobs, they can certainly
slow things down - but should slow down FIBPlus too... but this
is another area where I have not done direct comparison.
Can you try the two command line apps I posted against one or
more of the tables in your transfer? It would be interesting
to see how your numbers compare to what I was getting (prepare
times etc).
--
Geoff Worboys
Telesis Computing