Subject | [IBO] Re: Drop off support... My plans for the future. |
---|---|
Author | robert.gilland |
Post date | 2010-12-23T01:30:01Z |
That was me who did the lazarus port.
Now lazarus supports dfm ( in the latest development snapshots )
So there is no reason the whole IBObjects can't be ported.
I have my code still a port of IBObject 4.9.2.
But I can't find jason's email address to send it to.
Kind Regards,
Robert.
--
Now lazarus supports dfm ( in the latest development snapshots )
So there is no reason the whole IBObjects can't be ported.
I have my code still a port of IBObject 4.9.2.
But I can't find jason's email address to send it to.
Kind Regards,
Robert.
--
>
> I have also been working with FPC/Lazarus to expore its potential. I am
> quite impressed with what is available there. For those who would like to
> take their applications cross-platform, this is likely very good news. There
> was an FPC port of IBO (non-visual) that someone did with my authorization
> that I had a copy of at one time but I cannot find it right now. If someone
> out there has a copy of it I would be very grateful to have it sent to me. I
> plan to port at least the non-visual things to FPC. I'm not sure if this
> will be under the EDO name or some other name. It depends on if I will need
> a separate code base or not.
>
>