Subject | [IBO] Re: TIB_Cursor and DB_KEY |
---|---|
Author | clivewalden |
Post date | 2006-06-09T18:23:49Z |
Well (respectfully) that is an explanation without an answer<s>.
Three things:
1. As far as I can see, a read only, uni-directional cursor has no
need of a DB_KEY.
2. It should be controllable by the developer.
3. If IBO is going to return a hidden field for its own benefit, that
I did not request in my SQL, then it should not impact properties like
FieldCount. It should stay hidden.
Just my 2 cents.
Clive
Three things:
1. As far as I can see, a read only, uni-directional cursor has no
need of a DB_KEY.
2. It should be controllable by the developer.
3. If IBO is going to return a hidden field for its own benefit, that
I did not request in my SQL, then it should not impact properties like
FieldCount. It should stay hidden.
Just my 2 cents.
Clive