> "Re: Incompatible behaviour or bug between 4.3.Aa and 4.5B with
> Masterlink / KeyL" - Jan 13, 2006
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IBObjects/message/37900

I found the sample app you mentioned (it wasn't in the bug app folder) and I
took a look at this and figured out a way to fix this so that it will work
as it did in the past.

This issue will be resolved in the next release.

You may want to bear in mind, that in a perfectly technical sense, the
behavior you didn't like was actually the perfectly correct thing to do.

Because of the aggregate nature of the master query the RelName and SQLName
pieces of information for the CUSTNO column were purposely left blank
because they don't reference just a straight column anymore. They now
reference a column that is an aggregate, so there is a layer of indirection.
Because of the missing RelName and SQLName data for the column in the master
dataset being referenced, technically it should not have allowed a
relationship based on such. I'm only changing it because it allowed it to
still link up in the past. So, convenience and flexibility are winning out
over perfect technical correctness.

Regards,
Jason Wharton