Subject | RE: [IBO] Another Firebird 2.0 thingy |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2006-11-10T21:19:18Z |
I was not aware of this feature in FB2.
Why does Firebird 2.0 use the FOR token here?
IBO removes the FOR UPDATE clause on buffered queries because it is
obviously a bad idea to send records to a buffered dataset with one record
per network packet.
Regards,
Jason Wharton
Why does Firebird 2.0 use the FOR token here?
IBO removes the FOR UPDATE clause on buffered queries because it is
obviously a bad idea to send records to a buffered dataset with one record
per network packet.
Regards,
Jason Wharton
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com [mailto:IBObjects@yahoogroups.com]On
> Behalf Of Martijn Tonies
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:55 AM
> To: ibobjects@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [IBO] Another Firebird 2.0 thingy
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When executing this statement:
> select next value for category_id
> from rdb$database
>
> IBO mogrifies it into:
>
> select next value
> , RDB$DATABASE.RDB$DB_KEY
>
>
> I'm unsure if this has been fixed yet.
>
>
> Martijn Tonies
> Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL,
> NexusDB, Oracle &
> MS SQL Server
> Upscene Productions
> http://www.upscene.com
> My thoughts:
> http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
> Database development questions? Check the forum!
> http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
>