Subject | Re: Incompatible behaviour or bug between 4.3.Aa and 4.5B with Masterlink / KeyLink |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2006-01-11T23:37:45Z |
--- Marco Menardi wrote:
be more inclined to believe is that you had a mis-spelled table name
or something. It sounds like a fluke thing. I use fully qualified
MasterLinks and KeyLinks and they continue to work just fine.
If you can send me a sample app where it is demonstrating what you
are describing here I will devote some time to look into this.
Being that you have seen this behavior it should be very simple for
you to send me a database and a simple app.
Regards,
Jason Wharton
> Hi, I've a lot of problems with my application because some detailrelation
> queries don't work anymore after upgrading IBO from 4.3.Aa to 4.5B.
> I noticed this problem but I thought that was a more "permissive"
> behaviour of the old IBO with queries with grouping or union, but
> today I've faced the same problem with two "simple" queries, so I
> think that is a real bug instead.
> Here what I had and the different behaviour regarding to Masterlink
> and KeyLink setting:
>
> Master query:
> SELECT BANCA_ID
> , DESCRIZIONEDISP
> , SPORTELLO
> FROM BANCHE
>
> KeyLink
> BANCHE.BANCA_ID
>
> Detail query:
> SELECT CONTO_CORRENTE_ID
> , BANCA_ID
> , NUMERO
> , DESCRIZIONEDISP
> FROM CONTI_CORRENTE
>
> KeyLink
> (auto)
>
> MasterLink:
> a) CONTI_CORRENTE.BANCA_ID=BANCHE.BANCA_ID
> this worked fine in 4.3.Aa, but in 4.5B does not anymore (the
> is not build, so detail set stays empty)This seems like a very strange problem to be having. What I would
>
> b) BANCA_ID=BANCHE.BANCA_ID
> c) CONTI_CORRENTE.BANCA_ID=BANCA_ID
> d) BANCA_ID=BANCA_ID
>
> b,c,d work fine
>
> Removing KeyLink
> BANCHE.BANCA_ID
> or setting it as simply
> BANCA_ID
> in the master query has made a) work as before
>
> Any clue?
> regards
> Marco Menardi
be more inclined to believe is that you had a mis-spelled table name
or something. It sounds like a fluke thing. I use fully qualified
MasterLinks and KeyLinks and they continue to work just fine.
If you can send me a sample app where it is demonstrating what you
are describing here I will devote some time to look into this.
Being that you have seen this behavior it should be very simple for
you to send me a database and a simple app.
Regards,
Jason Wharton