Subject | RE: [IBO] IB_Grid and SrollBar issues. |
---|---|
Author | Daniel R. Jimenez |
Post date | 2005-05-09T04:57:40Z |
Hi,
On the 18th of January 2005, "melr_la" posted the following message, I also
posted this question of the On the 17th March 2005, could someone advise me
of the outcome/solution, as we are having the same problem. I have browsed
the archive, but have fail to find a reply.
all query(ies) to true?
daniel.
On the 18th of January 2005, "melr_la" posted the following message, I also
posted this question of the On the 17th March 2005, could someone advise me
of the outcome/solution, as we are having the same problem. I have browsed
the archive, but have fail to find a reply.
>>I encounter the following user interface quirks with IB_grid whenWe are using BCB 5 and have the same issues and have set AutoFetchAll for
>>used with Delphi.
all query(ies) to true?
> >1) When displaying a moderate to a large amount of informationThank you
> >retrieved by a query, the IB_grid slider in the vertical scrollbar at
> >first indicates that perhaps half the available rows are being
> >displayed, even if only about 1% of the rows are actually being
> >displayed. This is misleading. How can the scrollbar be made to
> >give a more accurate graphical representation of the number of rows
> >being displayed by the grid?
> >
> >2) When displaying a moderate to a large amount of information
> >retrieved by a query, when scrolling down the IB_grid vertical
> >scrollbar quickly shrinks and drops to (nearly) the bottom even
> >though many rows remain to be displayed. Much of the downward
> >vertical scrolling can then be done with no apparent visual change to
> >the scrollbar and there is effectively no vertical movement to the
> >scrollbar for most of the continued downward vertical scrolling.
> >This is misleading, and it makes it difficult to quickly scroll to
> >the bottom or to rows in the latter portion of those retrieved. How
> >can the scrollbar position be made to give a more accurate graphical
> >representation of the position of the rows shown relative to the
> >overall number of rows retrieved?
> >
>
> The post mention that using last and first was a work-around. However,
> when we try this work-around, we are not seen the required behaviour.
daniel.