Hi Stuart

> Hi Paul,
> I'm not sure for certain whether or not this is fixed in 4.3Ab (I
> think it is).

According to message 30280 - it is.

> however, someone was kind enough to forward me the fix
> when I had this problem. If you replace the problematic procedure
> with:
>
> The new one is:
> . . . .

That's great thanks - fixed now :-))

Regards
Paul