Its noticeably slower, and the IBO assumption was legitimate - which is
why it will be fixed for FB 1.51

Aage Johansen wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:36:57 +0000 (UTC), sllimr7139 wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Is there anything in particular that we (as IBO developers/users)
> should
> >> look out for?
> >
> > As one of the test case providers of the bug in question, I have to
> > say that there are a number of symptoms to this particular bug which
> > has made it hard to track down, as I understand it. I spent about 10
> > hours trying to eventually confirm that it ended in an API call in the
> > client dll, everything upto that point always looked good as far as I
> > could tell.
> > ...
> > The (short-term?) solution that Nickolay presented us was to run with
> > the IB_Connection.CacheStatementHandles set to false. This appears
> > to fix the bug for the time being but it's hard to tell yet what kind
> > of performance impact that may or may not have on our connections.
>
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> What about any consequences of setting
> IB_Connection.CacheStatementHandles
> to false.
> Severe/.../insignificant impact on response times, or what?
>
>
> Regards,
> Aage J.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> IB Objects - direct, complete, custom connectivity to Firebird or
> InterBase
> without the need for BDE, ODBC or any other layer.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> http://www.ibobjects.com - your IBO community resource for Tech Info
> papers,
> keyword-searchable FAQ, community code contributions and more !
>