Subject | Re: [IBO] BuilderX compliant |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2004-12-10T20:05:36Z |
yartax1 wrote:
Borland. It has one major flaw - It can not handle ANY Builder6 project.
It simply does not have any backwards compatibility with any existing
Builder projects!
We are promised a statement from Borland by the 15th December on what is
to happen to VCL programming in C++ and what Borland propose to do to
support Builder c++ developers that they have currently cut loose.
Another Interbase?
I'm not sure I would trust them to provide any forward path now, and a
switch to Eclipse CDT C++ development environment will be as easy as a
move to BuilderX. At least Eclipse actually works ;)
( This is on topic Jason - a move to provide generic a C++ version of
IBO could open a large market )
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
> Well, at the moment only is a possibility to pass to Builder X. ThereBuilderX is supposed to be the next generation of C++ compiler from
> are a lot of changes to be made. Before any change, I will contact
> with you to request more information.
Borland. It has one major flaw - It can not handle ANY Builder6 project.
It simply does not have any backwards compatibility with any existing
Builder projects!
We are promised a statement from Borland by the 15th December on what is
to happen to VCL programming in C++ and what Borland propose to do to
support Builder c++ developers that they have currently cut loose.
Another Interbase?
I'm not sure I would trust them to provide any forward path now, and a
switch to Eclipse CDT C++ development environment will be as easy as a
move to BuilderX. At least Eclipse actually works ;)
( This is on topic Jason - a move to provide generic a C++ version of
IBO could open a large market )
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services