Subject | Re: [IBO] Re: Future of IBObjects |
---|---|
Author | Walter Ogston |
Post date | 2004-10-11T14:25:43Z |
At 06:03 AM 10/10/2004, you wrote:
Let us not re-invent the wheel here. Borland's TClientDataSet does this
kind of thing nicely. Only I have found it does not work properly with a
provider connected to TIBO_Query (see my post some time ago about a SOAP
server - I forget the details but ended up using all Borland for that
project). I would put in my vote for keeping the TDataset descendents up
so they work with OEM components.
Just my $0.02 worth
Walter
/*----------------
C. Walter Ogston
ogstoncw@... Kalamazoo, Michigan
*/
>--- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, "Jason Wharton" <jwharton@i...> wrote:<snip>
> >
> > What kinds of things do you want or expect from IBO?
> >
>
>The first two things that comes in my mind are:
>- client side sorting. I've some "long" last query (10 seconds) that
>provides a small set of data (100 rows?), but is data that provides
>important information if you can sort them in 2 or 3 fields order. Now
>it's really annoying since you have to wait 10 seconds every time the
>sort order is changed. btw, the sort should be performed based upon
>multiple columns criteria (i.e. last_name, first_name, order_no).
Let us not re-invent the wheel here. Borland's TClientDataSet does this
kind of thing nicely. Only I have found it does not work properly with a
provider connected to TIBO_Query (see my post some time ago about a SOAP
server - I forget the details but ended up using all Borland for that
project). I would put in my vote for keeping the TDataset descendents up
so they work with OEM components.
Just my $0.02 worth
Walter
/*----------------
C. Walter Ogston
ogstoncw@... Kalamazoo, Michigan
*/