Using it on the Filter property invokes the code on the getter to reset the
query if necessary. Thus, IBO would be confused by an incremental
modification to this property. Not to mention it would have a performance
overhead.

Jason Wharton
CPS - Computer Programming Solutions
Mesa Arizona
http://www.ibobjects.com

-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --

----- Original Message -----
From: "stewartwarren" <stewartwarren@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [IBO] Small parsing bug


> Ditto what Norman and Lester reported. += is unreliable on TString
> class.
> Warren
>
>
> --- In IBObjects@yahoogroups.com, "Riho-Rene Ellermaa"
> <r.ellermaa@h...> wrote:
> > Its very weird.
> >
> > If I build the Filter up in parts:
> > Filter="ACCID IN(";
> > Filter+="16,";
> > Filter+="17";
> > Filter+=")";
> > then I get error.
> > If I copy from debugger the final string and then modify my code:
> > Filter="ACCID IN(16,17)";
> > then it works normaly????????
> >
> > Riho-Rene Ellermaa
> > senior programmer
> > Hansabank