Subject | Re: [IBO] Another disconnectTopool question |
---|---|
Author | Andreas Prucha |
Post date | 2003-12-12T09:53:33Z |
mp527 wrote:
threads. With the "classic" handling, it would be necessary to open and
close the DB for every connectoin because of the different threads.
In order to be a thread-safe pool in this context, IBO would have to
take a connection to the server from another, previous, thread.
Best Regards - Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Andreas Prucha
Helicon Software Development
>I don't think so, you always need a session.Hmm, but what if a server handles multiple quests in different, short,
>I have a session,connection,tranaction and query for each thread in
>my server. I believe Jason said that each session loads it own
>instance of fbclient.dll or gds32.dll and this really helps in
>mutithreaded apps.
>
>
threads. With the "classic" handling, it would be necessary to open and
close the DB for every connectoin because of the different threads.
In order to be a thread-safe pool in this context, IBO would have to
take a connection to the server from another, previous, thread.
>--
>
>
>
Best Regards - Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Andreas Prucha
Helicon Software Development