Subject | RE: [IBO] TIB_Query - weird problem |
---|---|
Author | Franky Brandt |
Post date | 2003-12-10T13:08:43Z |
Thanks all
Managed to find the problem now.
It was indeed one of the query's that was linked to the other query that
was causing the troubles.
I still don't get what the calculated fields have to do with the linked
query but it's probably just for going into edit mode that they
disappeared.
Anyway, fixed now
thank you all
Franky
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Paul Vinkenoog [mailto:paul@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 december 2003 12:30
Aan: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [IBO] TIB_Query - weird problem
Helen:
the post:
FH_STATUS,FH_PROJ,FH_VORD,FH_EXT1,FH_EXT2,FH_EXT3,FH_DEBLINK,FH_BV,FH_UN
IEK,FH_AFGEH,FH_MNT,
Franky:
Sorry, no idea what causes your problem. It must have something to do
with the calculated fields though, because if I understand you
correctly the problem arises as soon as you define a calculated field
(ANY calculated field?), even if you don't create a handler.
Do you have CalculateAllFields true? And if you have no calculated
fields: does the query still go into dssEdit after a post (but without
the values disappearing) or does it enter dssBrowse like expected?
And about the disappearing values: you say they are always the same
fields. Are they fixed fields? If you remove them from the select
clause, do other fields start disappearing or has the problem gone?
- 5 minutes later -
Hmmm, just re-read your post and I'm beginning to suspect the lookup
and detail queries that are hooked onto this dataset. Especially the
lookup queries. Can you unhook them and see what happens? Those
disappearing fields - are they in any way used in KeyLinks or
KeyDescLinks of lookup sets, or Master(Param)Links of detail sets?
I don't have any answers, but these are some things I would look into.
Greetings,
Paul Vinkenoog
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cr8al15/M=267637.4116719.5338353.1261774/D=eg
roupweb/S=1705007183:HM/EXP=1071142186/A=1853618/R=0/*http://www.netflix
.com/Default?mqso=60178338&partid=4116719> click here
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=267637.4116719.5338353.1261774/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1853618/rand=994020728>
________________________________________________________________________
___
IB Objects - direct, complete, custom connectivity to Firebird or
InterBase
without the need for BDE, ODBC or any other layer.
________________________________________________________________________
___
http://www.ibobjects.com <http://www.ibobjects.com> - your IBO
community resource for Tech Info papers,
keyword-searchable FAQ, community code contributions and more !
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
Managed to find the problem now.
It was indeed one of the query's that was linked to the other query that
was causing the troubles.
I still don't get what the calculated fields have to do with the linked
query but it's probably just for going into edit mode that they
disappeared.
Anyway, fixed now
thank you all
Franky
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Paul Vinkenoog [mailto:paul@...]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 december 2003 12:30
Aan: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [IBO] TIB_Query - weird problem
Helen:
> Am I blind, or do I really not see FH_UNIEK in your column list?I couldn't find it too, until I noticed that it got line-broken in
the post:
FH_STATUS,FH_PROJ,FH_VORD,FH_EXT1,FH_EXT2,FH_EXT3,FH_DEBLINK,FH_BV,FH_UN
IEK,FH_AFGEH,FH_MNT,
Franky:
> Ok, i added the fh_uniek field to the query, took out for update butThen you have FH_UNIEK twice in the select now.
> the problem still remains.
Sorry, no idea what causes your problem. It must have something to do
with the calculated fields though, because if I understand you
correctly the problem arises as soon as you define a calculated field
(ANY calculated field?), even if you don't create a handler.
Do you have CalculateAllFields true? And if you have no calculated
fields: does the query still go into dssEdit after a post (but without
the values disappearing) or does it enter dssBrowse like expected?
And about the disappearing values: you say they are always the same
fields. Are they fixed fields? If you remove them from the select
clause, do other fields start disappearing or has the problem gone?
- 5 minutes later -
Hmmm, just re-read your post and I'm beginning to suspect the lookup
and detail queries that are hooked onto this dataset. Especially the
lookup queries. Can you unhook them and see what happens? Those
disappearing fields - are they in any way used in KeyLinks or
KeyDescLinks of lookup sets, or Master(Param)Links of detail sets?
I don't have any answers, but these are some things I would look into.
Greetings,
Paul Vinkenoog
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12cr8al15/M=267637.4116719.5338353.1261774/D=eg
roupweb/S=1705007183:HM/EXP=1071142186/A=1853618/R=0/*http://www.netflix
.com/Default?mqso=60178338&partid=4116719> click here
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=267637.4116719.5338353.1261774/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1853618/rand=994020728>
________________________________________________________________________
___
IB Objects - direct, complete, custom connectivity to Firebird or
InterBase
without the need for BDE, ODBC or any other layer.
________________________________________________________________________
___
http://www.ibobjects.com <http://www.ibobjects.com> - your IBO
community resource for Tech Info papers,
keyword-searchable FAQ, community code contributions and more !
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .