Subject | Re: [IBO] Transaction Control |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2003-11-11T23:31:39Z |
At 06:02 PM 12/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
transaction model, IBX doesn't. People tend to use a lot of workarounds
with IBX to get where they need to go - such as clientdatasets and caching
to get a receptive client-side view of sets. In IBO you don't need the
workarounds, because the components implement what's required, without them.
Describe what you want to achieve.
Helen
>OK, been reading some more and I may be getting confused between theWhat is there about IBX that you want to emulate?
>native IBO comps and the TIBODataset stuff. I want to try and emulate
>the IBX methodology as much as possible to support my current apps and
>way of doing things.
>I'm not quite yet understanding how Transactions work with IBODatasetDifferences from IBX? yes, many, many. IBO fully supports the IB/FB
>group, mostly in the area of how they start transactions automatically.
> Other that, are there any other major differences in how transactions
>are performed in IBO?
transaction model, IBX doesn't. People tend to use a lot of workarounds
with IBX to get where they need to go - such as clientdatasets and caching
to get a receptive client-side view of sets. In IBO you don't need the
workarounds, because the components implement what's required, without them.
Describe what you want to achieve.
Helen