Subject | Re: Re[2]: [IBO] Is IBX better than IBO when used threaded ? |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2003-11-06T22:31:28Z |
FWIW, Persistent TField definitions are faster in all respects.
They are a GOOD thing when working with TDataset.
If I were to rewrite IBO, native IBO would have them too.
Jason Wharton
They are a GOOD thing when working with TDataset.
If I were to rewrite IBO, native IBO would have them too.
Jason Wharton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos" <ibo@...>
To: "Helen Borrie" <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IBO] Is IBX better than IBO when used threaded ?
> HB> TIBODataset has two column layers: one the VCL's persistent fields
and the
> HB> other the TIB_Columns of the InternalDataset. The trick is: Don't
use
> HB> persistent fields!
>
> Helen, regarding Tdataset persistent fields, when you do not explicit
> define them (in desgin time) they are created automaticly by Delphi in
> runtime, so you ALWAYS have persistent fields floating around when you
> use Tdataset. Anyway, I really don't think this is the reason for the
> bad performance. I use TIBO* component in 95% of my projects and they
> are really fast ;)
>
> []s
>
> Carlos
> WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
> FireBase - http://www.FireBase.com.br (Firebird/Interbase HQ)