| Subject | Re: [IBO] Is IBX better than IBO when used threaded ? |
|---|---|
| Author | Helen Borrie |
| Post date | 2003-11-01T12:03:26Z |
At 11:44 AM 1/11/2003 +0000, you wrote:
other the TIB_Columns of the InternalDataset. The trick is: Don't use
persistent fields!
Teach yourself not to use scrolling datasets for batch operations on
data. That's Paradox stuff, not IB/Fb. If you need to pass data through
the client, then read the source data with a TIB_Cursor and write it with a
TIB_DSQL.
Your rules should be: make the server do data manipulation; and: if you
don't need a datasource, then you don't need a TIBO component - use a
TIB_DSQL or a TIB_Cursor.
Helen
> > Anyway, I am particularly concerned by the poor performance ofTIBODataset has two column layers: one the VCL's persistent fields and the
> > IBODataSet.
>
>That´s a fact and comparing with other TDataset layers like FIB
>plus
>you reach the same conclusions. Why? Only Jason can tell us.
other the TIB_Columns of the InternalDataset. The trick is: Don't use
persistent fields!
Teach yourself not to use scrolling datasets for batch operations on
data. That's Paradox stuff, not IB/Fb. If you need to pass data through
the client, then read the source data with a TIB_Cursor and write it with a
TIB_DSQL.
Your rules should be: make the server do data manipulation; and: if you
don't need a datasource, then you don't need a TIBO component - use a
TIB_DSQL or a TIB_Cursor.
Helen