Subject | Re: [IBO] HDR and SQLWhereItems |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2002-11-30T00:50:21Z |
Not yet.
It is in my list of things to work on.
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
It is in my list of things to work on.
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Wurdak" <e9426420@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:38 AM
Subject: [IBO] HDR and SQLWhereItems
> Hi
>
> A long time ago there was a discussion about HDR (automatically disabled
> with SQLWhereItems). Jason proposed several solutions:
>
> >At this point, one thing to consider as a possible solution is to make it
so
> >that there is an alternative SQLWhereItems property that can be added to
> >which will not flip off the HDR mechanisms. You may not know it but there
> >are three different internal SQLWhere<priority> lists for query refining
> >criteria to be added to. They are SQLWhereHigh, SQLWhereLow and
> >SQLWhereItems (medium). In other words, there are internal things I
wanted
> >to be considered above and below the ones the user provided. (This mostly
> >has to do with forcing things so I can make assumptions about where input
> >parameters are in the SQL statement, not because I think I'm going to
affect
> >the performance/optimization of the query any.) I can add another
> >SQLWhere<something>Items property that will not turn off the HDR.
> >
> >Another possibility would be to add a method and make it the standard and
> >proper way to populate items into the SQLWhereItems queue. The method
could
> >have with it a flags parameter that would describe how the criteria
should
> >be considered. Whether or not it is a major refinement to the records of
the
> >dataset or just a minor one. Meaning some criteria would be used to get a
> >few records at a maximum (therefore using HDR would be
counter-productive)
> >and in other instances it might be something like reducing a large
dataset
> >by only a few records (therefore it would still be desirable to use HDR).
I
> >think I prefer this approach because we can add additional flags as
> >necessary.
>
> >I need to add a property something to the affect of:
> >
> >HDRMode: hdrmAuto, hdrmAlways, hdrmNever
>
> Was one of these solutions realized?
>
> lg
> Oliver