Subject | Re: [IBO] Field persistence question |
---|---|
Author | Jason Wharton |
Post date | 2002-11-25T22:26:51Z |
Your observation is correct and your complaint is heard. If persistent
fields appeals to you then I recommend you continue using the TDataset based
components. Most of the TIB_Query features are accessible via TIBODataset
anyway.
In the TIB_ there are other benefits to doing away with the persistent
fields concept.
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
fields appeals to you then I recommend you continue using the TDataset based
components. Most of the TIB_Query features are accessible via TIBODataset
anyway.
In the TIB_ there are other benefits to doing away with the persistent
fields concept.
Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com
-- We may not have it all together --
-- But together we have it all --
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan McDonald" <alan@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:38 AM
Subject: [IBO] Field persistence question
> It's a pity that there is no field persistence with the IB_ components. It
> means that the compiler can't catch your fieldname spelling errors - it's
> only caught at run time. Is there still no way but to use the fieldbyname
or
> the fields array?
> Alan