Subject | Re: Re:[IBO] Re: Concurrency Isolation |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2002-11-22T00:54:52Z |
Thanks for the clarification. It's not that clear in the help. After
reading your reply, it made it clearer.
Daniel Rail
At 21/11/2002 06:58 PM, you wrote:
reading your reply, it made it clearer.
Daniel Rail
At 21/11/2002 06:58 PM, you wrote:
>No, this is not what AutoCommit is about.
>
>If you tell IBO you want a snapshot view of the database then you are taking
>responsibility to Commit/Rollback your own transactions based upon the
>desired view. This is one mode where there is no automatic transaction
>closing. When in Concurrency isolation YOU are responsible to close your
>transactions.
>
>Jason Wharton
>CPS - Mesa AZ
>http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>-- We may not have it all together --
>-- But together we have it all --
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Daniel Rail" <daniel@...>
>To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:59 PM
>Subject: Re:[IBO] Re: Concurrency Isolation
>
>
> > At 21/11/2002 02:46 PM, you wrote:
> > >Hi Geraldo,
> > >
> > > > Yes, it is. If you don't commit the transaction, it will remail
> > > > open and you'll be working with the first "photography" taken from >
> > > the database.
> > >
> > >So, do I need to start an explicit transaction and then commit (or
> > >rollback) it after the job is finished ? Or there is a way of doing this
> > >without starting an explicit transaction ?
> >
> > Set TIB_Transaction.AutoCommit to True.
> >
> >
> > Daniel Rail
> > Senior System Engineer
> > ACCRA Group Inc. (www.accra.ca)
> > ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.accramed.ca)